Minister of Public Enterprise Retirement Sparks Debate on the Future of State-Owned Entities in South Africa

The South African general public is not fazed by the retirement of Minister of Public Enterprises, Pravin Gordhan; they are still accusing him of wrongdoing

 

SAA is one of the government companies that are in danger of being sold

The retirement of the Minister of Public Enterprises in South Africa has stirred mixed sentiments among the public. Despite calls for his retirement persisting over the years, the announcement has not been met with universal satisfaction. A longstanding point of contention arises from the perceived undoing of the efforts initiated by previous administrations, notably those of Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma.

 

During the tenures of Mbeki and Zuma, a concerted effort was made to safeguard key public enterprises, ensuring their continued governance by the state. The policy of refraining from privatizing these entities was a cornerstone of their administrations. However, under the current leadership of Cyril Ramaphosa, there has been a discernible shift in this approach. The public has increasingly perceived a tendency towards the privatization of remaining public enterprises, a move that has not resonated well with the citizenry.

 

Minister Pravin Ghordan, in his capacity, has been viewed as a proponent of this shift, further fueling public discontent. The dissatisfaction with the administration's trajectory has placed the public in a precarious position, akin to standing at the intersection of conflicting interests. Consequently, whether the Minister retires or not, there is a prevailing sentiment that the underlying issues will persist, rendering the retirement itself inconsequential in addressing the broader concerns of the public.

For more on this story, read a story by The South African news on this Microsoft link

Wenzeni uZuma

Decoding 'Wenzeni uZuma': Unraveling the Mystery Behind the Chant 

Zuma is always welcomed by tens and thousands who will defend him by asking "wenzeni uZuma?"

In the tumultuous world of South African politics, one chant echoed through the streets: "Wenzeni uZuma," a phrase that became the battle cry for former President Zuma's supporters. But what exactly did Zuma do to earn this catchy slogan?

 

The allegations against Zuma range from misconduct to a notorious state capture orchestrated by the Gupta family, who seemingly had a VIP pass to the presidential inner circle. Rumor has it; they even had the authority to hire ministers. Talk about an exclusive membership!

 

Despite the passage of time, the "Wenzeni uZuma" chant remains as persistent as a catchy tune you can't get out of your head. Some folks still insist that Zuma is the epitome of corruption. However, when the anti-Zuma brigade is asked to spill the beans on his alleged wrongdoings, they often find themselves tongue-tied.

 

Picture this: Zuma supporters playfully ask, "Wenzeni uZuma?" translating to "What has Zuma done?" The accusers, in a classic twist, struggle to come up with a compelling answer. It's like a game of cat and mouse, with Zuma's critics pointing fingers at unproven accusations or cases that have already seen their day in court.

 

Enter the pro-Zuma response: "Wenzeni uZuma, wenzeni uZuma! Sicela nisitshele ukuthi uZuma wenzeni; wena udlala i-propaganda, sitshele ukuthi uZuma wenzeni." Loosely translated, it's a challenge to the naysayers – "Tell us what Zuma has done wrong! You're just pawns in the propaganda game against Zuma. Give us the juicy details!"

 

Adding more intrigue to the Zuma saga is the enduring arms deal case, a legal rollercoaster that has spanned over two decades. Yet, amidst all the courtroom drama, no one has definitively proven whether Zuma pilfered from the public coffers. It's like the ultimate unsolved mystery, making "Wenzeni uZuma" the multimillion-dollar question everyone wants the answer to.

 

In the ever-entertaining drama of South African politics, "Wenzeni uZuma" stands as a symbol of intrigue, challenge, and a dash of humor. So, the next time someone throws that question your way, make sure you've got your popcorn ready – it's a political thriller that keeps on giving!