Let’s stop pretending. Cyril Ramaphosa’s visit to the United States wasn’t diplomacy—it was damage control, shrouded in half-truths and dubious motives. The man who claims to lead a democratic South Africa didn’t just hop across the Atlantic for handshakes and photo ops. No, he arrived with a handpicked entourage of elite business moguls—including billionaire Johan Rupert—and South African golfers, yes, golfers, as though this were a leisure retreat, not a political mission.
Let’s call this what it is: a shenanigan-stuffed expedition designed to pacify critics in Washington. And for what? To address the laughably false claim of white genocide in South Africa—an allegation that’s been dragged out again and again by groups like AfriForum, and now parroted by the likes of Donald Trump and Elon Musk. This wasn’t a state visit. This was a well-funded PR tour aimed at neutralizing a narrative, not with facts, but with economic appeasement and golfing charm.
But here’s the kicker: why now? Why is it during Ramaphosa’s tenure that this narrative of "white genocide" has suddenly gained traction on global stages? Is it a coincidence? Or could it be linked to the president’s own controversial past statements—like his infamous "frog in boiling water" analogy, interpreted by many (especially AfriForum) as a veiled threat against white South Africans? If that comment had been made by anyone else, they would’ve been hauled through international courts by now.
Now enter Elon Musk—another South African by birth, billionaire by Silicon Valley, and self-styled victim of racial exclusion. He claims South Africa won’t allow his satellite internet company, Starlink, to operate there because he’s white. That’s his story. And the South African government’s silence? Deafening. Instead of addressing the accusation head-on, Ramaphosa’s solution is to fly overseas and bring along Rupert—the very symbol of white capital in South Africa—to whisper sweet reassurances into Trump’s ear.
Apparently, Rupert told Trump that “killings are across the board,” and then lobbied for Starlink and drones to help “fight crime.” Wait, what? Since when did Starlink become South Africa’s savior from violent crime? There are dozens of satellite internet providers worldwide. Why the obsession with this one—run by a man who claims his country of birth is racially targeting his people?
This isn’t about internet access. It’s about influence. About optics. About calming down a U.S. president, a tech billionaire, and an ultra-right-wing lobby group whose narrative threatens to define South Africa’s image abroad.
Let’s get real: people are dying in South Africa. Crime is rampant, and the state has failed to protect its citizens, black and white. But calling it “white genocide” is dishonest and inflammatory. Ramaphosa knows that. And yet, instead of standing firm and defending the truth from home, he chooses a performative overseas tour, flanked by golf clubs and billionaires, to refute something he should’ve crushed with facts years ago.
The sad truth? This trip wasn’t about South Africa. It wasn’t about solving crime. It wasn’t even about Starlink. It was about saving face. For a president who started his tenure in the shadows of legitimacy—gaining office before even facing the ballot box—it’s no surprise his diplomacy now feels equally backdoor and opportunistic.
South Africa deserves transparency, not theatrics. We need leadership rooted in integrity—not shenanigans dressed up as diplomacy.
.jpeg)
